IDMs — Intel, Samsung, and the Cost of Running Fabs
Why Intel is restructuring into IDM-plus-foundry, how Samsung's vertically integrated mobile / memory / foundry plays out, and the structural economics
The IDM — Integrated Device Manufacturer, the company that designs AND manufactures its own chips end to end — was the dominant semiconductor business model from the 1960s through the early 2000s. It is now a shrinking minority at the leading edge, displaced by the fabless / foundry split covered in lessons sc1_l1 and sc1_l4. But the IDM model has not disappeared — it remains structurally dominant in memory (DRAM, NAND), analog, and many automotive / industrial categories, and two of the largest IDMs in the world — Intel and Samsung Electronics — operate at scales that no fabless designer can match.
This lesson is about the IDM model in 2024-2025: why Intel is restructuring into IDM-plus-foundry, how Samsung's multi-business integration plays out, and the structural economics that make IDMs simultaneously the highest-capex and highest-execution-risk business model in semiconductors. The historical IDM model integrated four activities under one corporate roof: chip design, mask manufacturing, wafer fabrication, and assembly / test.
That is the opening. Finishing a lesson is where it stops being interesting and starts being useful: the full lesson runs to 7 sections and ends with 6 practice questions. A free account is what opens the rest, and the other 255 lessons in the Academy with it. No card.
What this lesson covers
- 1Why Intel lost the leading-edge logic IDM advantage
- 2The structural economics of running leading-edge fabs
- 3Intel and Samsung — IDM economics across the 2020-2024 period
- 4Why Intel's restructuring is high-execution-risk — the unit economics math
- 5Intel 2024 — restructuring under stress, $7.86B CHIPS Act support, leadership transition
- 6Where to see this on the platform
- 7Summary