Behavioral Finance
The biases that destroy portfolios and how to recognize them
In 2020, Terrance Odean — the UC Berkeley finance professor who has spent three decades studying retail investor behavior using actual brokerage records — published an updated analysis of trading data from a major US discount brokerage. The finding that has replicated across every dataset, every country, and every market regime since his original 1998 paper: retail investors are approximately 1.5 times more likely to sell a stock that is up from their purchase price than one that is down.
This pattern — called the disposition effect — costs the average retail investor an estimated 3-4% per year in a taxable account. The investors who sold their winners and held their losers would have been better off doing the exact opposite: holding the winners (which continued to outperform on average) and selling the losers (which continued to underperform on average, and would have generated a tax loss to offset gains elsewhere).
That is the opening. Finishing a lesson is where it stops being interesting and starts being useful: the full lesson runs to 4 sections and ends with 5 practice questions. A free account is what opens the rest, and the other 255 lessons in the Academy with it. No card.
What this lesson covers
- 1Recency bias — why investors chase last year's winners and flee last year's losers
- 2Anchoring — the invisible reference point that distorts every decision
- 3Confirmation bias and overconfidence — the thesis-preservation instinct
- 4Where to see this on the platform