The Phillips Curve
Historical patterns and modern critique — why the unemployment-inflation relationship is unstable, and what NAIRU actually means in practice
In 1958 the New Zealand-born economist A.W. Phillips published a paper in *Economica* (the journal of the London School of Economics) titled 'The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1861-1957.
' The paper presented a scatter plot of the U.K. unemployment rate against the rate of wage inflation across nearly a century of British data, and the scatter showed a clear inverse relationship — high unemployment coincided with low wage inflation, and vice versa.
The relationship became known as the Phillips curve, and within a few years it was the centerpiece of macroeconomic policy thinking — economists and central bankers spoke as if there was a stable tradeoff between unemployment and inflation that policymakers could exploit. By the late 1970s the simple version of the curve had broken down empirically (the U.S.
experienced stagflation: high unemployment and high inflation simultaneously, a combination the simple Phillips curve said could not happen).
That is the opening. Finishing a lesson is where it stops being interesting and starts being useful: the full lesson runs to 6 sections and ends with 6 practice questions. A free account is what opens the rest, and the other 255 lessons in the Academy with it. No card.
What this lesson covers
- 1Friedman-Phelps and the expectations-augmented Phillips curve
- 2The expectations-augmented Phillips curve and NAIRU estimation
- 3Phillips curve interpretations across eras — what worked, what broke
- 4Powell August 23 2019 Jackson Hole — the FOMC chair acknowledges the Phillips curve flattening
- 5Where to see this on the platform
- 6Summary